Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The text must be written in one of the accepted languages: Portuguese, Spanish, English or French.
  • The contribution must be situated in the field of anthropology - or related areas as long as it presents potential interest to the anthropological community.
  • The file follows the following guidelines for publication: Font: Times New Roman 12; Spacing: 1.5; Margins: 2.5 (top and bottom) by 3.0 (sides).
  • We encourage the use of images and other resources (videos, drawings, sounds, etc), as long as they respect copyright and image rights and are credited. We suggest that each manuscript contain at least one image.
  • The author uses footnotes instead of endnotes.
  • The file must be submitted in ".docx" format and must NOT contain any identification of the author, including name, institutional affiliation or e-mail. All the necenessary personal data is inserted at the registration stage. In the case of self-citation, replace your name with "Author". For example, if your name is John García, use (Author 2012: 120) in the text and do not include the reference in the References.
  • The formatting of references should follow the rules described in the Instructions to Authors. We insist that the perfect adequacy of references formatting will be especially observed at the desk review stage. Papers that do not meet the standards will be returned for resubmission.
  • Title, Abstract and Keywors must be informed in both English and Portuguese language both in the file and on the submission system.
  • I confirm that I have carefully read the conditions listed below, being aware that non-observance of any of them will result in summary rejection of the submission.
  • The filling in of the field "Bio" is MANDATORY and the following data must be informed, in this order: Last academic degree obtained or in progress; Institution where you currently work or study, including Center/Faculty, Department/Program, city, country.
    Example: Doctor/Doctoral candidate in Social Anthropology. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Center of Philosophy and Human Sciences, Department of Anthropology, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Author Guidelines

New Debates accepts spontaneous submissions and also publishes specific calls for articles. Every contribution is assessed by its Editorial Board and is peer reviewed.

The Forum section is open for proposals at any time. You can contact us by email if you would like to organise a discussion around a specific topic. We value both thematic and institutional diversity.

Submissions must strictly comply with the standards described below

  1. We accept texts in the following languages: Portuguese, Spanish, English and French.
  2. New Debates is open to contributions from neighbouring disciplines provided that their ideas are of potential interest to the anthropological community.
  3. The norms for publication are as follows: Font: Times New Roman 12; Spacing: 1.5; Margins: 2.5 (above and below) by 3.0 (right and left). 
  4. The use of images and other media (videos, drawings, audio, etc.) is highly encouraged as long as the author respects author and image rights. We suggest that every article contains at least one image.
  5. The formatting of references should strictly follow the guidelines at the bottom of the page. The respect of this norms will be especially observed for the evaluation of submissions.
  6. We adopt footnotes instead of endnotes.
  7. The file must be in Word format (“.doc” or “.docx” extensions) and be named with the title of the contribution only. The manuscript must NOT contain any personal information such as author’s name, institutional affiliation or e-mail. 

In-text citations should appear as follows: (Lomnitz 1987: 53)

References should appear as follows:

Books
PEIRANO, Mariza. 2006. A Teoria Vivida: E Outros Ensaios. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.

Collective Books
LIMA FILHO, Manuel; ABREU, Regina; ATHIAS, Renato. (Orgs.). 2016. Museus e Atores Sociais: Perspectivas Antropológicas. Recife: UFPE.

Book Chapters
VISVANATHAN, Shiv. 2008. “Hegemonía oficial y pluralismos contestatarios”. In: Gustavo Lins Ribeiro e Arturo Escobar. Antropologías del mundo. Popayán, Colombia: Diseño Grafico e Impresiones. p. 287-310.

Articles
DAS, Veena. 1993. “Sociological Research in India: The State of Crisis”. Economic and Political Weekly 28(23): 1159-1161.

Thesis
VIDAL, Lux. 1973. Put-Karôt (Xikrin), grupo indígena do Brasil Central. Tese de Doutorado em Antropologia Social, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

New Research

This section serves as a space for debating central theoretical, methodological, and policy issues for contemporary anthropological reflection and practice, focusing on a problem or theme to be debated by all invited collaborators. It is open to both epistemological or theoretical problems that pervade much of today's anthropological research and discussions on the political and social landscape, or challenges related to anthropological practice in the 21st century. This section can be organized by guest editors or based on spontaneous submissions of Forum proposals around a “problem.” Thus, it differs from the New Research section, as it is a space for debating specific issues, even if based on the individual research of invited researchers. It is also not a thematic dossier, as it seeks to be a debate forum. To explore available electronic resources, we propose that readers also submit contributions to the Forum after its publication. We believe this possibility is a powerful tool for fostering discussions among young researchers and for showing the “state of the art” of certain anthropological themes and problems, with contemporary contributions from researchers currently dedicated to such topics.

The maximum length is 10,000 words, including bibliographic references.

Forum

This section serves as a space for debating central theoretical, methodological, and policy issues for contemporary anthropological reflection and practice, focusing on a problem or theme to be debated by all invited collaborators. It is open to both epistemological or theoretical problems that pervade much of today's anthropological research and discussions on the political and social landscape, or challenges related to anthropological practice in the 21st century. This section can be organized by guest editors or based on spontaneous submissions of Forum proposals around a “problem.” Thus, it differs from the New Research section, as it is a space for debating specific issues, even if based on the individual research of invited researchers. It is also not a thematic dossier, as it seeks to be a debate forum. To explore available electronic resources, we propose that readers also submit contributions to the Forum after its publication. We believe this possibility is a powerful tool for fostering discussions among young researchers and for showing the “state of the art” of certain anthropological themes and problems, with contemporary contributions from researchers currently dedicated to such topics.

The maximum length is 10,000 words, including bibliographic references.

Pedagogies

This section is dedicated to articles on teaching anthropology and experience reports supported by ethnographic and/or theoretical reflections on the transmission of the discipline inside or outside the classroom. Contributions can address formal university teaching practices of the discipline, as well as experiences of transmitting the discipline in schools, extension projects, and various contexts. We accept articles and essays, but also dossiers with material produced by students resulting from innovative pedagogical experiences. It is not just about publishing articles resulting from courses, but publishing material, duly presented and contextualized, that contributes to the reflection on possible ways of teaching anthropology.

The maximum length is 10,000 words, including bibliographic references.

Craft

We accept articles and reports on the professional practice of anthropology beyond scientific institutions and higher education. With the expansion and growing professionalization of the discipline, the presence of anthropologists in various public and private institutions, such as public agencies, NGOs, and consultancies, as well as their work as independent professionals in different types of professional ventures, is increasingly significant. In this context, we invite colleagues to reflect in a qualified manner on the role of anthropology in building institutions, public policies, public debates, and even other central fields of activity in the contemporary world. What does anthropology have to offer to these different non-academic universes, and what can they offer to anthropology research and teaching at the university? We also accept contributions on the profession of anthropology at the university, as long as they are dedicated to more institutional considerations regarding the field of anthropology.

The maximum length is 10,000 words, including bibliographic references.

Reviews

Following the composition of most academic journals in the humanities, Novos Debates has a reviews section open to presenting books, films, and exhibitions of potential anthropological interest, as we understand it is an important text format for circulating and critiquing anthropological production. While employing this traditional section common to our field's journals, we are also open to discussing other types of works, such as films and exhibitions.

The maximum length is 2,500 words, including bibliographic references.

Variations

Since its embryonic period, at least since the 19th century, anthropology has resorted to different forms of recording and textuality: drawings, photographs, field notes, field diaries, fiction, poetry, exhibitions, etc. Although scientific text has consolidated, like other sciences, as the transmission form par excellence of anthropological research, this diversity of formats has always been constitutive of anthropological practice due to its creative power and ethnographic sensitivity. Thus, we invite the submission of contributions in less usual formats, ranging from artistic expressions to technological experiments, with the aim of producing decentralized and critical forms of ethnographic and theoretical thought. We are open to the most diverse and unexpected forms of contribution.

Essays

We also invite researchers to submit texts to the Essays section, which is open to critical texts on current public debate topics (such as indigenous issues, sexual rights, political demonstrations, anthropology education, university system expansion, health policies, among others) or contemporary debates in anthropology. The maximum length is 10,000 words, including bibliographic references.

Compositions

This section is dedicated to the dissemination of visual anthropology works. It receives videos, photographic essays, and occasionally other formats proposed and of potential interest to anthropological research. On one hand, it plays an important role in publishing audiovisual works, increasingly abundant, of quality and heuristic potential for anthropological reflection; on the other hand, it represents an important editorial advance in incorporating new formats and languages in times of consolidation of electronic publications.

The compositions must be submitted in the following format:

Photographic essays

  • Photographic essays must be submitted in Presentation format (DOC. or DOCX.).
  • They must contain a title and the author's name, along with a presentation of the research, no longer than 500 words (including spaces).
  • One essay per author will be accepted with up to 10 photographs, in a resolution of at least 300 dpi. Captions are optional.

Audiovisual productions

  • Videos of any length will be accepted.
  • For submission, it is necessary to send a text file (doc or docx) with the following information: (a) The link to the video/film already published on the internet (YouTube or Vimeo); (b) the names of the directors, year of production, format, and duration; and (c) a comment on the video/film with a maximum of 500 words, including spaces.

The submission of audiovisual works implies acceptance of our Copyright Policy as stated in About the Journal (we no longer request the signing of a declaration form).

Interview

Finally, we welcome interviews with researchers, public agents, or members of social movements, which can be submitted for editorial review. In this issue, Novos Debates is interested in interviews with anthropologists who have experience working in public agencies, NGOs, etc., and who work or have worked in processes of territorial rights recognition. For now, we will only accept interviews in text format. The maximum length is 8,000 words, including bibliographic references.

Translations

Aligning with perspectives that value the importance of initiatives aimed at reducing inequality in access to knowledge, in this section, we wish to publish works not yet available in Portuguese, considered relevant to anthropology and its various fields of interest. We created this new section to welcome and publish translations of works by authors considered "classics," but not only. Maintaining the broader editorial line that accompanies Novos Debates, we aim to encourage the translation of authors working outside the hegemonic knowledge production axis centered in the global North and also to open space for initiatives to disseminate recent productions and less known but undeniably relevant materials for the anthropological field.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.