La rue, la sante, la politique
De quelques définitions de la "population en situation de rue" et de leurs trajectoires à São Paulo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48006.2358-0097.2122References
BARROS Joana. 2004. Moradores de rua. Pobreza e trabalho: interrogações sobre a exceção brasileira. Mestrado em sociologia, São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas (USP-FFLCH).
BLUMER, Herbert. 2004. “Les problèmes sociaux comme comportements collectifs”. Politix, 67: 185-199.
DE LUCCA, Daniel. 2007. A rua em movimento. Experiências urbanas e jogos sociais em torno da população de rua, Mestrado em antropologia social, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas (USP-FFLCH).
DEWEY, John. 2010. Le public et ses problèmes. Paris : Gallimard.
EMERSON, Robert et MESSINGER, Sheldon. 1977. “The micropolitics of trouble”. Social problems, 25(2): 121-134.
FASSIN, Didier. 2010. La raison humanitaire. Une histoire morale du temps présent. Gallimard : Paris
_____. 2009. “Les économies morales revisitées”. Annales HSS, 6: 1237-1266.
LIPSKY, Michael. 1980. Street-level bureaucrats, dilemas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation : New York.
LIPSKY, Michael e RATGHEB SMITH, Steven. 2011. "Traiter les problèmes sociaux comme des urgences". Tracés, 20(1): 125-149.
MELO Tomás Enrique de Azevedo Gomes. 2011. A rua e a sociedade. Articulações politicas, socialidade e a luta por reconhecimento da população em situação de rua, Mestrado em Antropologia Social, Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de ciências humanas, letras e artes, departamento de antropologia.
ROY, Damien. 2011. Cuidar do cuidador. Sociologie d'une équipe de santé de rue de la ville de Sao Paulo. Mémoire de master en sociologie. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales – Paris.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Novos Debates
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Open Access Statement
Novos Debates is an open access journal. We do not charge any fee for the publication of articles or for access to our issues. All our content, unless otherwise indicated, is licensed under Creative Commons Brazil Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0 BR).
You are free to:
– Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
– Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
– The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
– Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
– No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
