A study of/on India’s middle class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48006/2358-0097-1106Abstract
In order to establish the context of its emergence and the contemporary nature of the Indian middle class, this paper briefly presents its intricate link with colonialism and with economic liberalization. While this debate is focused and concentrated on the discussions in India, it also outlines how international approaches have been used to study it. In doing so, it assesses the ways in which contemporary scholarship is expanding on the theories of class as designed by late nineteenth and early twentieth century thinkers, Karl Marx and Max Weber. It then examines how the ideas of late twentieth century theorists such as Pierre Bourdieu are integrated in understanding and comprehending the new middle class in its relationship with capitalism.
References
BOURDIEU, Pierre. 2012. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Translated by Richard Nice and with a new Introduction by Tony Bennett). Routledge, Oxon.
_____. 1987. “What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups”. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32: 1-17.
_____. 1986. “The forms of capital”. In: J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood. pp. 241-258.
BETEILLE, Andre. 2002. “The social character of the Indian middle class”. In: Imtiaz Ahmad and Helmut Reifeld (eds.). Middle class values in India and Western Europe. New Delhi: Social Science Press. pp. 73-85.
FERNANDES, Leela. 2007.India’s New Middle Class: Democratic Politics in an Era of Economic Reform.New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
DESHPANDE, Satish. 2003. “The centrality of the middle class”. In: S. Deshpande Contemporary India: A Sociological View. New Delhi: Viking. pp.
-150.
MARX, Karl. 2000. ‘Wage, labour and capital’ (translated by H. E. Lothrop) New York Labor News CA, Mountain View. Published Online by Socialist Labor Party of America (www.slp.org) December 2000; Accessed from: slp.org/pdf/marx/w_l_capital.pdf on Aug 26, 2012, 1300 Hrs IST.
MISRA, Banke Bihari. 1960. The Indian Middle Classes: Their Growth in Modern times. London: Oxford University Press.
MUKERJI, Dhurjati Prasad. 1958. “Indian tradition and social change”. In: Dhurjati Prasad Mukerji. Diversities: Essays in Economics, Sociology and Other Social Problems. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House, 228-241.
_____. 2002. Indian Culture: A Sociological Study. New Delhi: Rupa and Company.
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF APPLIED ECONOMIC RESEARCH. 2004.The Great Indian Middle Class: Results from the NCAER Market Information Survey of Households. New Delhi: NCAER.
SHORTELL, Timothy. ‘Weber’s theory of social class’: Accessed from: http://www.brooklynsoc.org/courses/43.1/weber.html on 24 December, 2012, 14:20 IST.
SRIDHARAN, E. 2004. “The growth and sectorial composition of India’s middle classes: Its impact on the politics of economic liberalization’. India Review, 3(4): 405–428.
VANAIK, Achin. 2002. “Consumerism and new classes in India”. In: Sujata Patel, J. Bagchi and K. N Raj (eds.). Thinking Social Science in India: Essays in Honour of Alice Thorner. New Delhi: Sage Publications. pp. 227-234.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Novos Debates
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Open Access Statement
Novos Debates is an open access journal. We do not charge any fee for the publication of articles or for access to our issues. All our content, unless otherwise indicated, is licensed under Creative Commons Brazil Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0 BR).
You are free to:
– Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
– Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
– The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
– Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
– No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.