Goodness!
The empirical turn in health care ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48006/2358-0097/V9N1.E9102Keywords:
empirical ethics, medical ethics, health care, ethnography, anthropologyAbstract
Abstract
This paper is intended to encourage scholars to submit papers for a symposium and the next special issue of Medische Antropologie which will be on empirical studies of normative questions. We describe the ‘empirical turn’ in medical ethics. Medical ethics and bioethics in general have witnessed a move from applied ethics (the application of rules and principles to complex situations) to a renewed interest in practical, everyday ethical issues and the ways health care providers deal with them in practice. We highlight four forms of empirical research in ethics: studies about the effects of some form of institutionalized ethics in health care; studies about ethical views and practices in society; studies about ethical issues concerning medical innovations, and finally, studies about the normativity of care practices. We end the paper with an assessment of the function of empirical ethics research: to provide the building blocks for societal debate about health care.
References
BEAUCHAMP, T. 1999. “The 4 principles approach”. In: NELSON, J. L, NELSON, H. L (eds.), Meaning and medicine. A reader in the philosophy of health care, pp. 147-156. New York: Routledge.
BORRY, P; SCHOTSMAN, P; DIERICK, K. 2005. “Empirical ethics: A challenge to bioethics”. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy, 7, pp. 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000022001.91748.47
BORRY, P; SCHOTSMAN, P; DIERICK, K. 2004. “The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics”. Bioethics, 19, pp. 49-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00424.x
HARBERS, H. 2005. “Introduction”. In: H. HARBERS (ed.) Inside the politics of technology. Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048503841
HARBERS, H; MOL, A; STOLLMEYER, A. 2002. “Food matters: Arguments for an ethnography of daily care”. Theory, Culture & Society, 19 (6-7): 207-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899228
HOFFMASTER, B. 1992. “Can ethnography save the life of ethics?”. Social Science & Medicine, 35 (12):1421-1431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90045-R
MACINTYRE, A. 1984. After virtue. A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MOL, A. 2008. The logic of caring. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927076
MOORE, G. E. 1903. Principia ethica. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
POLS, J. 2004. Good care. Enacting a complex ideal in long-term psychiatry. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.
POLS, J. 2006. “Washing the citizen: Washing, cleanliness and citizenship in mental health care”. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 30 (1):77-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-006-9009-z
POLS, J. 2008. “Which empirical research, whose ethics? Articulating ideals in long-term mental health care”. In: WIDDERSHOVEN, G. et al. (eds.), Empirical ethics, pp.51-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199297368.003.0005
POLS, J; WILLEMS, D. 2010. “Innovation and evaluation. About taming and unleashing telecare technologies”. Sociology of Health & Illness, In press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x
POOL, R. 2000. Negotiating a good death. Euthanasia in the Netherlands. London: Routledge.
GERRITS, G. J. E. 2008. Clinical encounters: Dynamics of patient-centred practices in a Dutch fertility clinic. Universiteit van Amsterdam (unpublished PhD thesis).
SCHNEIDERMAN, L. J. et al. 2003. “Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: A randomized controlled trial”. JAMA 290(9):1166-1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.9.1166
SCHÜKLENK, U. 2011. “Publishing Bioethics and Bioethics–Reflections on Academic Publishing by a Journal Editor”. Bioethics, 25(2):57-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01878.x
THE, A-M. 2008. In death’s waiting room. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
TRONTO, J. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
VAN DELDEN, H. et al. 2005. Ethiek en empirie. Theorie en methodologie van empirisch ethisch onderzoek. Maastricht: Onderzoeksinstituut Caphri Universiteit Maastricht.
VAN DER WAL, G. et al. 2003. Medische besluitvorming aan het einde van het leven. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
VAN ZWIETEN, M, WILLEMS, D; KNEGT, L; LESCHOT, N. 2006. “Communication with patients during the prenatal testing procedure: An explorative qualitative study”. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(1-2):161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.013
VERMEULEN, E. 2001. Een proeve van leven: Praten en beslissen over extreem te vroeg geboren kinderen. Amsterdam: Aksant.
VON WRIGHT, G.H. 1993. Varieties of goodness. New York: The Humanities Press.
WILLEMS, D. “Varieties of goodness in high-tech home care”. In: MOL, A; POLS, J; MOSER, I (eds.), Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms, pp. 257-276. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839414477.257
WILLEMS, D. POLS, J. 2010. "Goodness! The empirical turn in health care ethics." Medische antropologie, 22 (1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Novos Debates
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Open Access Statement
Novos Debates is an open access journal. We do not charge any fee for the publication of articles or for access to our issues. All our content, unless otherwise indicated, is licensed under Creative Commons Brazil Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0 BR).
You are free to:
– Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
– Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
– The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
– Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
– No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
