Breathtaking practicalities
A politics of embodied patient positions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48006/2358-0097/V9N1.E9108Keywords:
body, social theory, disease/illness, ethnography, politicsAbstract
By declaring biomedicine as its apolitical counter-discourse, social theory, including disability studies, experiences problems discussing bodies and their
ailments. This paper explores possibilities to ‘bring bodies back in’ in politically relevant ways, while avoiding reducing bodies to singular, natural ‘givens’. This is done by exploring some of the practices in which people with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) attempt to live with their chronic disease and together with others. It becomes clear that what they experience as important physico-social problems are the invisibility of their disease, combined with the visibility of the aids used to deal with its problems. This combination leads to behaviour that is incomprehensible to others. It is demonstrated that some form of presence of the disease is needed to create social positions that allow patients to live with others in an acceptable way. The paper continues by exploring ways in which bodies are made present in useful ways. These are found where the people with COPD: (1) create communities of shared bodies that allow for a multitude of visible and invisible presences of COPD; (2) develop ways to educate their bodies in different ways to create new presences; (3) use their bodies as sources of knowledge about living with breathlessness; and (4) create transportable bodies to take COPD presences elsewhere, by using the argument of ‘demonstration by numbers’, the workings of time and by playing out the exceptional characteristics of their bodies and situations. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relatively unexplored possibilities for creating and sharing ‘patient knowledge’ and the areas this opens up for a new politics of social inclusion.
References
BARBOT, J. 2006. “How to build an ‘active’ patient”. Social Science and Medicine, 3, p. 538-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.025
BARBOT, J; DODIER, N. 2002. “Multiplicity in scientific medicine: The experience of HIV- positive patients”. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27, p.404-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700304
BARNES, C; MERCER, G; SHAKESPEARE, T. 1999. Exploring disability. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BOEVINK, W. 2006a. Stories of recovery. Working together towards experiential knowledge in mental health care. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Trimbos-instituut.
BOEVINK, W. 2006b. From being a disorder to dealing with life. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1(2), p. 17-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbi068
DAVIS, L.J. 1997. The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 2001. The expert patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London: Department of Health.
DIXON, L; HACKMAN, A; LEHMAN, A. 1997. “Consumers as staff in assertive community treatment program”. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 25, p.199-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022243106341
EDGAR, A. 2005. “The expert patient. Illness as practice”. Medicine. Health Care and Philosophy, 8, 165-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-2277-5
ELIAS, N. 1976. Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Baden-Baden, Germany: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag.
EPSTEIN, S. 2008. “Patient groups and health movements”. In: HACKET, E.J; AMSTERDAMSKA, O; LYNCH, M; WAJCMAN, J (eds) The handbook of science and technology studies, p.499-539. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GOFFMAN, E. 1968. Stigma. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican.
GREENHALGH, T. 2009. “Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: Beyond the expert patient”. British Medical Journal, 338, b.49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b49
HABRAKEN, J.M; POLS, J; BINDELS, P.J.E; WILLEMS, D.L. 2008. “The silence of patients with end-stage COPD: A qualitative study”. British Journal of General Practice, 58, p. 844-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X376186
HENDRIKS, R. 1998. “Egg timers, human values and the care of autistic youths”. Science, Technology and Human Values, 23(4), p.399-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399802300403
HUGHES, B. 2009. “Wounded/monstrous/abject: A critique of the disabled body in the sociological imaginary”. Disability and Society, 24(4), p.399-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590902876144
HUGHES, B; PATERSON, K. 1997. “The social model of disability and the disappearing body. Towards a sociology op impairment”. Disability and Society, 12(3), p 325-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727209
LAW, J. 2002. Aircraft stories. De-centering the object in techno-science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
MEAD, S; HILTON, D; CURTIS, L. 2001. “Peer support: A theoretical perspective”. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(2): 134-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095032
MOL, A. 1998. “Missing links, making links. The performance of some atheroscleroses”. In: BERG, M and MOL, A (eds) Differences in medicine, p. 144-165. Durham, London: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220pvr.11
MOL, A. 2002. The body multiple. An ontology of medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151
MOL, A. 2008. The logic of care. London: Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927076
MOL, A; LAW, J. 2004. “Embodied action, enacted bodies. The example hypoglycaemia”. Body and Society, 10, p.43-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042932
MOL, A; POLS, J. 1996. “Ziekte leven: Bouwstenen voor een medische sociologie zonder disease/illness-onderscheid [Living disease: Building blocks for a medical sociology without the illness/disease distinction]”. Kennis en methode. Tijdschrift voor wetenschapsfilosofie en wetenschapsonderzock, 20(4), p.347-361.
MOSER, I. 2000. “Against normalisation: Subverting norms of ability and disability”. Science as Culture, 9, 201-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713695234
MOSER, I. 2005. “On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: The multiple modes of ordering disability and their interferences”. Cultural Studies, 19, p.667-700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365648
MOSER, I. 2006. “Disability and the promise of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal”. Information, Communication and Society, 9(3), p 373-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751348
MOSER, I. 2009. “A body that matters? The role of embodiment in the recomposition of life after a road traffic accident”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11(2), p.81-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410902830520
MOSER, I; LAW, J. 1999. “Good passages, bad passages”. In: LAW, J and HASSARD, J (eds) Actor network theory and after, p.196-217. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03489.x
MOWBRAY, C.T; MOXLEY, D; COLLINS, M.E. 1998. “Consumers as mental health providers: First person accounts of benefits and limitations”. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 25, p.397-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287510
OLIVER, M. 1996. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
POLS, J. 2005. “Enacting appreciations: Beyond the patient perspective”. Health Care Analysis, 13(3), p.203-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-6448-6
POLS, J. 2006. “Washing the citizen: Washing, cleanliness and citizenship in mental health care”. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 30(1), p.77-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-006-9009-z
POLS, J. 2008. “Which empirical research, whose ethics? Articulating ideals in long-term mental health care”. In: WIDDERSHOVEN, G; HOPE, T; SCHEER, VD; MCMILLAN, J Empirical ethics in psychiatry, p.51-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199297368.003.0005
POLS, J. 2009. “Burgerschap in relaties. Over zichtbaarheid, onzichtbaarheid en het belang van lotgenoten [Citizenship in relations. About visibility, invisibility and the importance of fellow patients]”. Maandblad Geestelijke volksgezondheid, 64(9), p.760-774..
POLS, J. 2010a. “Telecare: What patients care for”. In: MOL, A; MOSER, I; POLS, J (eds) Care in practice, p.171-193. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
POLS, J. 2010b. “Wonderful webcams. About active gazes and invisible technologies”. Science Technology and Human Values. DOI: 10.1177/0162243910366134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910366134
POLS, J. 2011. “Breathtaking practicalities: A politics of embodied patient positions”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, v. 13, n. 3, p. 189-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2010.490726
SHAKESPEARE, T. 2006. Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203640098
SHERLOCK, J. 1996. “Dance and the culture of the body. Where is the Grotesque?” Women’s Studies International Forum, 19(5), p. 525-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(96)00047-7
SORENSEN, E. 2009. The materiality of learning. Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
STRUHKAMP, R; MOL, A; SWIERSTRA, T. 2009. “Dealing with in/dependence: Doctoring in physical rehabilitation practice”. Science, Technology and Human Values, 34, p. 55-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907312954
TAYLOR, S; SHOULTZ, B; WALKER, P. 2003. Disability studies: Information and resources. http://thechp.syr.edu/disability_studies_2003_current.html#Introduction
THOMSON, R.G. 1997. “Feminist theory, the body and the disabled figure”. In: DAVIS, J.L (eds) The disability studies reader, p.279-292. London: Routledge.
TRAPPENBURG, M. 2008. Genoeg is genoeg. Over gezondheidszorg en democratie [Enough is enough. About health care and democracy]. Amsterdam: AUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053568194
VELPRY, L. 2008. “The patient’s view: Issues of theory and practice”. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 32, p.238-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-008-9086-2
WINANCE, M. 2001. The`se et Prothe`se. Le processus d’habilitation comme fabrication de la personne. Paris: ENSMP, CSI.
WINANCE, M. 2007. “Being normally different? Changes to normalisation processes: From alignment to work on the norm”. Disability and Society, 22(6), p.625-638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701560261
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. 1980. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: WHO.
ZOLA, I.K. 1991. “Bringing our bodies and ourselves back in: Reflections on a past, present and future ‘medical sociology’”. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, p.1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136796
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Novos Debates
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Open Access Statement
Novos Debates is an open access journal. We do not charge any fee for the publication of articles or for access to our issues. All our content, unless otherwise indicated, is licensed under Creative Commons Brazil Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0 BR).
You are free to:
– Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
– Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
– The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
– Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
– No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
