Bondade!

A virada empírica dentro da ética da assistência à saúde

Autores/as

  • Dick Willems University of Amsterdam
  • Jeannette Pols University of Amsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48006/2358-0097/V9N1.E9102

Palabras clave:

ética empírica, ética médica, assistência à saúde, etnografia, antropologia

Resumen

Resumo
Este artigo pretende incentivar que acadêmicos enviem trabalhos para um simpósio e para a próxima edição especial da Medische Antropologie, que tratará de estudos empíricos sobre questões normativas. Descrevemos a “virada empírica” na ética médica. A ética médica e a bioética em geral testemunharam um movimento da ética aplicada (a aplicação de regras e princípios para situações complexas) para um interesse renovado nas questões éticas práticas e cotidianas, nos problemas e nas formas como os profissionais de saúde lidam com eles na prática. Destacamos quatro formas de pesquisa empírica na ética: estudos sobre os efeitos de algumas formas de éticas institucionalizadas na assistência à saúde; estudos sobre visões e práticas éticas na sociedade; estudos sobre questões éticas relativas a inovações médicas e, finalmente, estudos sobre a normatividade das práticas de cuidado. Terminamos o artigo com uma avaliação da função da pesquisa ética: prover um alicerce para o debate social sobre assistência à saúde.

Biografía del autor/a

Dick Willems, University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

Jeannette Pols, University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

Citas

BEAUCHAMP, T. 1999. “The 4 principles approach”. In: NELSON, J. L, NELSON, H. L (eds.), Meaning and medicine. A reader in the philosophy of health care, pp. 147-156. New York: Routledge.

BORRY, P; SCHOTSMAN, P; DIERICK, K. 2005. “Empirical ethics: A challenge to bioethics”. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy, 7, pp. 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000022001.91748.47

BORRY, P; SCHOTSMAN, P; DIERICK, K. 2004. “The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics”. Bioethics, 19, pp. 49-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00424.x

HARBERS, H. 2005. “Introduction”. In: H. HARBERS (ed.) Inside the politics of technology. Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048503841

HARBERS, H; MOL, A; STOLLMEYER, A. 2002. “Food matters: Arguments for an ethnography of daily care”. Theory, Culture & Society, 19 (6-7): 207-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899228

HOFFMASTER, B. 1992. “Can ethnography save the life of ethics?”. Social Science & Medicine, 35 (12):1421-1431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90045-R

MACINTYRE, A. 1984. After virtue. A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

MOL, A. 2008. The logic of caring. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927076

MOORE, G. E. 1903. Principia ethica. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

POLS, J. 2004. Good care. Enacting a complex ideal in long-term psychiatry. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.

POLS, J. 2006. “Washing the citizen: Washing, cleanliness and citizenship in mental health care”. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 30 (1):77-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-006-9009-z

POLS, J. 2008. “Which empirical research, whose ethics? Articulating ideals in long-term mental health care”. In: WIDDERSHOVEN, G. et al. (eds.), Empirical ethics, pp.51-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199297368.003.0005

POLS, J; WILLEMS, D. 2010. “Innovation and evaluation. About taming and unleashing telecare technologies”. Sociology of Health & Illness, In press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x

POOL, R. 2000. Negotiating a good death. Euthanasia in the Netherlands. London: Routledge.

GERRITS, G. J. E. 2008. Clinical encounters: Dynamics of patient-centred practices in a Dutch fertility clinic. Universiteit van Amsterdam (unpublished PhD thesis).

SCHNEIDERMAN, L. J. et al. 2003. “Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: A randomized controlled trial”. JAMA 290(9):1166-1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.9.1166

SCHÜKLENK, U. 2011. “Publishing Bioethics and Bioethics–Reflections on Academic Publishing by a Journal Editor”. Bioethics, 25(2):57-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01878.x

THE, A-M. 2008. In death’s waiting room. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

TRONTO, J. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

VAN DELDEN, H. et al. 2005. Ethiek en empirie. Theorie en methodologie van empirisch ethisch onderzoek. Maastricht: Onderzoeksinstituut Caphri Universiteit Maastricht.

VAN DER WAL, G. et al. 2003. Medische besluitvorming aan het einde van het leven. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.

VAN ZWIETEN, M, WILLEMS, D; KNEGT, L; LESCHOT, N. 2006. “Communication with patients during the prenatal testing procedure: An explorative qualitative study”. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(1-2):161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.013

VERMEULEN, E. 2001. Een proeve van leven: Praten en beslissen over extreem te vroeg geboren kinderen. Amsterdam: Aksant.

VON WRIGHT, G.H. 1993. Varieties of goodness. New York: The Humanities Press.

WILLEMS, D. “Varieties of goodness in high-tech home care”. In: MOL, A; POLS, J; MOSER, I (eds.), Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms, pp. 257-276. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839414477.257

WILLEMS, D. POLS, J. 2010. "Goodness! The empirical turn in health care ethics." Medische antropologie, 22 (1).

Publicado

2024-06-17

Cómo citar

Willems, D., & Pols, J. (2024). Bondade! A virada empírica dentro da ética da assistência à saúde. Novos Debates, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.48006/2358-0097/V9N1.E9102

Número

Sección

Traduções