Curriculum and its Discontents
Reflections on Student Political Activism from an Indian Public University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48006/2358-0097/V8N1.E8105Keywords:
Student Politics, Delhi University, Identities, Ideology, Curriculum, Syllabus ProtestsAbstract
This paper emanates from my doctoral research initiated in 2015. It looks at the intersections between ideologies and politics in higher education spaces. It discusses a case study of Delhi University and critically understands the interventions of particularistic ideologies in the process of curriculum design and syllabi formation. Using existing literature and ethnographic snippets from the field, the paper seeks to elaborate upon recent episodes of campus protests and dissent concerning the syllabuses of four subjects to primarily argue that students share an intrinsic relationship with politics and that it is difficult to segregate the two. It also attempts to demonstrate and thereby conclude that arbitrary tendencies to achieve academic hegemony or homogeneity via curriculum design or knowledge formation can lead to the construction of exclusive knowledge which excludes diversities or plural social realities. Such a phenomenon then masks, alters or hinders longstanding quests for democratising university spaces in postcolonial conditions.
References
ALTBACH, Philip G. 1999. “At large: Student power: Politics and revolution”. Change 31(5): 52-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389909604223
ALTBACH, Philip G. 2007. “Student Politics: Activism and Culture”. In: J.J.F. Forest and P.G. Altbach (eds.). International Handbook of Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 329-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_17
ALTBACH, Philip G; KLEMENČIČ, Manja. 2014. “Student activism Remains a Potent Force Worldwide”. International Higher Education 76: 2-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.76.5518
APPLE, Michael W. 2019. Ideology and Curriculum (Fourth Edition). New York: Routledge.
BALL, Stephen J. 1993. “Education, Majorism and the Curriculum of the Dead”. Curriculum Studies 1(2): 195-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965975930010202
BOURDIEU, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power (translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson). Cambridge: Polity.
CASTELLS, Manuel. 2010. The Power of Identity (second edition). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
CHAUDHURI, Rosinka. 2018. “Questions of minority, agency and voice: student protests in India”. Postcolonial Studies 21(3): 338-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2018.1497936
DELLA PORTA, Donatella; CINI, Lorenzo; GUZMÁN-CONCHA, Cesar. 2020. Contesting Higher Education: Student Movements against Neoliberal Universities. Bristol: Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529208627.001.0001
DESHPANDE, Satish. 2016. “Higher Education: An Uncertain Policy Process”. Economic and Political Weekly 51(35): 37-40.
Edex Live. 2019. “AISA calls for march to protest RSS interference in Delhi University syllabus, ABVP calls it unfortunate”, 22 July 2019.
GUPTA, Suman. 2019. “Indian student protests and the nationalist–neoliberal nexus”. Postcolonial Studies 22(1): 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2019.1568163
HABERMAS, Jürgen; BLAZEK, John R. 1987. “The Idea of the University: Learning Processes”. New German Critique 41: 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/488273
HEYES, Cressida. 2020. “Identity Politics”. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Accessed from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/identity-politics/ on 08th February 2022.
JAFFRELOT, Christophe. 2000. “The Hindu nationalist movement in Delhi: from ‘locals’ to refugees—and towards peripheral groups?”. In: Véronique Dupont et al. (eds.). Delhi: Urban Space and Human Desires. New Delhi: Manohar. p. 181-203.
JAYARAM, Narayana. 2007. “India”. In: James J. F Forest and Philip G. Altbach (eds.). International Handbook of Higher Education [Part One: Global Themes and Contemporary Challenges]. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 747-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_38
JEFFREY, Craig. 2012. Timepass: Youth, Class, and the Politics of Waiting in India. New Delhi: Foundation Books.
KUMAR, Sanjay. (ed.). 2014. Indian Youth and Electoral Politics: An Emerging Engagement. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
LUKOSE, Ritty A. 2010. Liberalization’s Children: Gender, Youth and Consumer Citizenship in Globalizing India. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391241
MARTELLI, Jean-Thomas; GARALYTĖ, Kristina. 2019. “Generational Communities: Student Activism and the Politics of Becoming in South Asia”. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal (SAMAJ) 22: 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.6486
Outlook. 2022. “DU Okays UG Curriculum Framework Formulated In Line With NEP”, 14 February 2022.
PATHANIA, Gaurav Jogi. 2018. The University as a Site of Resistance: Identity and Student Politics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199488414.001.0001
SARKAR, Tanika. 2019. “How the Sangh Parivar writes and teaches history”. In: Angana P. Chatterji et al. (eds.). Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism is Changing India. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 151-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190078171.003.0009
Sunday Times. 2021. “Draft curriculum including coding and robotics to be gazetted: Ramaphosa”, 25 February 2021.
The Times of India. 2019. “Protests force course ‘correction’ in Delhi University”, 18 July 2019.
The Wire. 2019. “ABVP Calls DU’s Revised Syllabus ‘Anti-RSS’, Protests outside VC’s Office”, 17 July 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Novos Debates
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Open Access Statement
Novos Debates is an open access journal. We do not charge any fee for the publication of articles or for access to our issues. All our content, unless otherwise indicated, is licensed under Creative Commons Brazil Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0 BR).
You are free to:
– Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
– Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
– The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
– Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
– No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
